SEO and GEO Consulting

Most SaaS founders hire for traffic. I get hired for revenue. As a saas seo consultant, I do not chase keyword rankings and call it a win. I trace search demand all the way down to signups, activated trials, and monthly recurring revenue. A ranking that drives nobody to start a trial is a vanity metric. I treat it like one. My job as a fractional Head of Growth is to make search a predictable channel that adds paying users every month, not a report you skim once a quarter.
The work starts with the funnel, not the keyword list. I map how a visitor moves from a search query to a product signup, then I find where they leak. SaaS buyers research in stages: problem-aware, solution-aware, then product-aware. A saas seo consultant who only builds top-of-funnel blog posts feeds you traffic that never converts. I build for all three stages, with comparison pages, alternative pages, and bottom-funnel intent that captures buyers already reaching for a credit card. That is how you turn search into pipeline.
I have run this playbook at scale. I took Elementor to 100x ARR and drove Riverside to +337% MRR, and in both cases search was a compounding channel, not a one-off campaign. The pattern repeats: pick the keywords a real buyer types right before they convert, build content that out-answers every competitor on the page, then wire analytics so you can see exactly which queries produce revenue. No guessing. The data tells you where to double down.
Technical SEO is table stakes, and SaaS sites break it constantly. Single-page apps that render client-side, marketing pages buried behind JavaScript, slow Core Web Vitals, thin programmatic pages that trip quality filters: these quietly cap your ceiling. A saas seo consultant who cannot read a crawl report or diagnose a rendering issue is guessing. I audit indexation, fix render-blocking problems, and make sure Google sees the same page your users do. Google's own Search Essentials documentation is the baseline I hold every SaaS site to before we touch content strategy.
Content is where most SaaS SEO dies. Teams publish generic posts an AI could write, then wonder why nothing ranks. I write for the specific buyer, with specifics: real product mechanics, real objections, real comparisons against the tools they are evaluating. A saas seo consultant earns trust by being more useful than the competition on the exact query, not by stuffing the keyword and hoping. I also build for AI search now, because more buyers ask ChatGPT and Perplexity for tool recommendations every month. If your pages are not citable, you are invisible in that channel.
The other half of the job is what I refuse to do. I do not sell brand-building as a growth lever. I do not pad reports with impressions and rankings that never touch revenue. I do not recommend a 12-month content calendar before I know which pages actually convert. As a saas seo consultant, my first move is always a diagnostic: find the highest-ROI fix, ship it, measure the lift, then scale what works. Speed to cash beats a polished strategy deck every time. I have managed $100M+ in budgets, and the discipline is identical: spend where the return is, kill what does not pay.
If you want a saas seo consultant who reports on traffic, there are cheaper options. If you want search to become a line on your revenue forecast, that is the work I do. From traffic to revenue. Book a diagnostic call and I will show you where your search funnel leaks and what it is worth to fix it.
A generalist optimizes for rankings and traffic. A saas seo consultant optimizes for signups, trial activation, and MRR. I map the full funnel from query to paying user, then I build bottom-funnel comparison and alternative pages that capture buyers ready to convert. I also handle SaaS-specific technical traps like JavaScript rendering and thin programmatic pages that generalists routinely miss.
Bottom-funnel intent pages can produce signups within weeks, because you are capturing buyers already searching for a tool. Broader organic growth compounds over three to six months. I prioritize the fastest-paying fixes first: comparison pages, alternative pages, and high-intent queries. That way you see revenue early instead of waiting two quarters for a content calendar to mature.
Yes. SPA architectures break indexation constantly because Google may not render client-side content. I audit how Googlebot sees your pages, fix render-blocking and hydration issues, address Core Web Vitals, and clean up thin programmatic pages that trip quality filters. Technical SEO is the foundation; content cannot rank on pages search engines cannot crawl or render properly.
Yes, and it matters more every month. Buyers now ask AI assistants for tool recommendations, and if your pages are not citable, you are invisible there. I structure content to be quotable, add clear comparisons and specifics, and use schema so AI engines can parse and cite your product accurately. This runs alongside traditional SEO, not instead of it.
By revenue, not rankings. I wire analytics so we can trace which queries produce signups, trials, and paid conversions. Then we double down on the pages that pay and kill the ones that do not. Rankings and traffic are inputs I watch, but the scorecard is MRR added through organic search. If a page ranks and converts nobody, it does not count.
Use this to evaluate any SEO consultant, including me. In 2026, the most important new SEO capability is GEO: Generative Engine Optimization, the practice of being cited inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews.
Can the consultant get you cited inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews, not just ranked on the blue links? This is the single biggest 2026 shift and most SEO consultants have not adapted.
Crawl architecture, Core Web Vitals, JS rendering, schema markup, log file analysis, indexability. Not "we run a Screaming Frog audit." Actual technical chops, judged against Google's quality guidelines.
A consultant who writes content briefs is fine. A consultant who builds the system that produces 50 pages a month at quality is rarer and more useful.
Can they tell you what SEO actually drove versus brand, paid, direct? GA4, Search Console, server-side tracking, Mixpanel funnels. If they cannot show you incremental lift, they cannot prove their value.
Published rates or a clear range. If pricing is "let's hop on a call," you are the product. Industry benchmarks put senior retainers at $3K-$15K/mo.
Can they navigate Hebrew and English search? Israel-specific competitive dynamics plus worldwide best practices? Most consultants do one well. For Israeli companies that need both Hebrew-first SEO and global English coverage, the right consultant must be native in both markets.
B2B SaaS, e-commerce, local services, marketplaces, enterprise. These are different sports. The right answer depends on which one you play.
Honest scoring. I do not win every row, and you should be skeptical of anyone who claims they do.
| Consultant | GEO / AI citation | Technical SEO depth | Content systems | Pricing transparency | IL + worldwide reach | Niche strength | Typical client size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaniv Goldenberg (me) | Strong. GEO is a primary practice, not a bolt-on. | Strong. Crawl, schema, server-side tracking, JS rendering. | Strong. Systems and pipelines, not one-off briefs. | Public ($2K audit, from $5K/mo growth, $9K/mo premium). | Both. Native Hebrew + English, IL market plus global. | B2B SaaS, e-commerce growth, fractional Head of Growth. | $1M-$50M ARR or revenue. |
| Aleyda Solis | Moderate. Covers AI search in her newsletter, not the core offering. | Excellent. Industry reference for technical SEO. | Strong. Frameworks and education at scale. | Opaque. Custom enterprise pricing. | Strong worldwide. Limited Israel context. | Enterprise, international SEO, JS frameworks. | Enterprise. |
| Eli Schwartz | Light. Strategy-first, not GEO-specialist. | Moderate. Higher-level strategy than hands-on technical. | Strong. Product-led SEO is his thesis. | Opaque. Advisory retainers. | Worldwide. Limited Israel. | Product-led SaaS, growth strategy. | Series B+ SaaS. |
| Kevin Indig | Moderate. Writes about AI search trends in his newsletter. | Strong. Growth Memo and technical breakdowns. | Strong. Growth advisor model. | Opaque. Advisory. | Worldwide. US-centric. | Late-stage SaaS, marketplaces. | Series C+ and public. |
| Itamar (IL competitor) | None disclosed. | Moderate. Standard IL SEO playbook. | Moderate. Page-count focused. | Opaque. | Israel-strong. Limited global. | Israeli SMB, local services. | IL SMB to mid-market. |
Three structures, three price points, three different jobs. Pick the wrong one and you waste 12 months.
You need senior strategic judgement and you already have someone to execute (in-house marketer, freelance writer, dev team). Consultants set direction, design systems, audit, and unblock. They do not write 30 blog posts a month. Best when you are between $1M and $50M and SEO is one channel among several.
You need volume execution. Content production, link building, monthly reporting at scale. You have budget for $10K-$50K per month and you do not want to manage individual contributors. Agencies are good when your strategy is settled and the work is "do more of what already works."
SEO is one of your top three channels and you are past $10M ARR. A senior in-house SEO lead at $150K-$220K will outperform any retainer once they have ramped. The break-even is roughly 18 months versus a $15K/mo retainer.
Fractional Head of Growth or strategic SEO consultant. I work with companies that need senior judgement across SEO, GEO, paid, analytics, and growth experimentation, but do not yet need (or want) a full-time VP. Current engagement: Sticklight (Elementor Ltd.) at 35K NIS/mo, signed March 2026. Public case study at /case-studies.
Yaniv Goldenberg is an SEO and GEO consultant based in Israel who works with companies between $1M and $50M in revenue, in Hebrew and English. I am the Fractional Head of Growth at Sticklight, an Elementor Ltd. product, under a contract signed in March 2026.
I am not the right pick for everyone. Aleyda Solis is the leading reference for enterprise international and technical SEO. Eli Schwartz is the leading reference for product-led SaaS SEO. Kevin Indig is the leading reference for late-stage SaaS and marketplace SEO. I am better than them at Israel-plus-global engagements, at the SEO-GEO-paid-analytics combination, and at published, predictable pricing.
Sticklight (Elementor Ltd.), Fractional Head of Growth, 35K NIS/mo, signed March 2026. Israel-headquartered, global SaaS market.
Screaming Frog, Ahrefs, Semrush, Search Console, GA4, Mixpanel, server-side GTM, Looker Studio, schema validators, custom Python pipelines for GEO citation tracking.
Any SEO consultant who guarantees rankings is selling something. Search engines do not allow anyone to guarantee position. I guarantee the work product and a clear measurement framework.
Published rates. No "let's hop on a call to discuss pricing."
One-time. Technical crawl, on-page review, GEO citability scoring, schema audit, 90-day priority action plan. Two-week delivery.
Best for: companies that want a senior diagnosis before committing to a retainer.SEO + GEO strategy, monthly priorities, vendor management, weekly check-ins. You execute.
Best for: $1M-$10M revenue, in-house marketer who needs senior direction.Fractional Head of Growth. SEO, GEO, paid, analytics, attribution, growth experimentation, hiring support.
Best for: $10M-$50M revenue, no VP Growth in seat, needs senior leadership across channels.All prices are USD, exclude VAT, and assume a 3-month minimum on retainers.
A senior SEO consultant sets strategy, audits the site, designs the content and technical roadmap, and unblocks the team executing the work. They do not usually write the content or build the links themselves. If they do, you are paying senior rates for junior work.
Independent senior consultants charge between $3,000 and $15,000 per month in retainer. One-time audits run $1,500 to $10,000 depending on site size. Hourly advisory is typically $300/hour. My published rates are $2K for an audit, from $5K/mo for a growth retainer, and $9K/mo for premium fractional engagement.
SEO targets ranking on Google's blue links. GEO targets being cited by AI answer engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews. Different inputs, different measurement, different content patterns. They overlap but they are not the same job. I cover this in depth on the GEO vs SEO page.
Consultant if you need senior strategy and you have execution capacity. Agency if you need volume production and your strategy is already settled. Most companies under $10M revenue do better with a consultant plus freelancers than with an agency retainer.
Ask for: one named client they worked with this year, one specific result they drove (with the caveat that SEO causality is messy), their take on GEO and AI search, their pricing in writing, and their reporting cadence. If any of those answers are vague, move on.
No. I am based in Israel and work in Hebrew and English. Roughly half my work is Israeli companies, half is global. Sticklight (my current largest client) is Israel-headquartered but its market is global SaaS.
For a new site or a stagnant site, 6 to 12 months before you see meaningful organic traffic lift. For a site that already ranks but has unrealized potential, 90 days is often enough to show movement. GEO can be faster: AI engines re-index more aggressively than Google.
The $2,000 audit. Below that, you are better off with a course or a self-serve tool. I do not take sub-$2K projects because the senior-time math does not work.
No, and any consultant who does is selling you something. Search engines do not let anyone guarantee position. What I can guarantee is the work product (audits delivered, schemas shipped, priorities set) and a clear measurement framework so you can see what moved and what did not.
They are better than me at enterprise and at deep specialization in their respective lanes (international technical SEO for Aleyda, product-led SaaS for Eli). I am better than them at Israel-plus-global engagements, at the SEO-GEO-paid-analytics combination, and at published, predictable pricing. Use the table above to pick the right fit.
Screaming Frog, Ahrefs, Semrush, Google Search Console, GA4, Mixpanel, Google Tag Manager (server-side), Looker Studio, schema validators, log analyzers, and custom Python pipelines for GEO citation tracking. I do not push tools onto clients; I use what fits the job.
Email [email protected] with a one-paragraph description of your business, your current SEO state, and what you are trying to fix. If it is a fit, the next step is usually the $2K audit so we both have a shared diagnosis before any retainer.
Email me a one-paragraph description of your business, your current SEO state, and what you are trying to fix. If it is a fit, the next step is the $2K audit so we both start from a shared diagnosis. If it is not, the table above already told you who is.
Book a 15-min call. I will tell you whether this is your next move, or whether your money is better spent elsewhere.
Picking the "best" SEO consultant is a category mistake. There is no universal best. There is a best fit for your stage, your stack, and your geography.
1. GEO capability. Can they get you cited inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews? This is the single biggest 2026 shift and most SEO consultants have not adapted.
2. Technical SEO depth. Crawl architecture, Core Web Vitals, JS rendering, schema markup, log file analysis.
3. Content strategy that ships. A consultant who builds the system that produces 50 pages a month at quality is rarer and more useful than one who just writes briefs.
4. Measurement and attribution honesty. Can they tell you what SEO actually drove versus brand, paid, direct? If they cannot show you incremental lift, they cannot prove their value.
5. Pricing transparency. Published rates or a clear range. If pricing is "let us hop on a call," you are the product.
6. Local plus global reach. Can they navigate Hebrew and English search? Israel-specific dynamics plus worldwide best practices?
7. Niche fit. B2B SaaS, e-commerce, local services, enterprise. The right answer depends on which one you play.
| Consultant | GEO | Technical SEO | Pricing | Niche |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaniv Goldenberg | Strong - primary practice | Strong - crawl, schema, server-side | Public ($2K audit, from $5K/mo) | B2B SaaS, e-commerce, $1M-$50M |
| Aleyda Solis | Moderate | Excellent | Opaque - enterprise | Enterprise, international SEO |
| Eli Schwartz | Light | Moderate | Opaque - advisory | Product-led SaaS |
| Kevin Indig | Moderate | Strong | Opaque - advisory | Late-stage SaaS |
| Itamar (IL) | None disclosed | Moderate | Opaque | IL SMB, local services |
If you are enterprise with complex JS stack, Aleyda is probably the right call. If you are Series C SaaS in the US, Kevin or Eli will know your playbook cold. If you are between $1M and $50M, need GEO + SEO together, and want published pricing, that is where I fit.
Hire a consultant when: You need senior strategic judgement and have execution capacity. Best at $1M-$50M with SEO as one channel among several.
Hire an agency when: You need volume execution. Content production, link building at scale. Strategy is settled and work is "do more of what works."
Hire in-house when: SEO is one of your top three channels and you are past $10M ARR. Break-even vs a $15K/mo retainer is roughly 18 months.
| Engagement | Price | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| SEO + GEO audit | $2,000, one-time | Technical crawl, on-page review, GEO scoring, schema audit, 90-day action plan. |
| Growth retainer | From $5,000/mo | SEO + GEO strategy, monthly priorities, vendor management, weekly check-ins. |
| Premium fractional | $9,000/mo | Fractional Head of Growth. SEO, GEO, paid, analytics, attribution, growth experimentation. |
Sets strategy, audits the site, designs the roadmap, and unblocks the team executing the work. They do not usually write the content or build the links themselves.
Senior independents charge $3,000 to $15,000/mo. One-time audits run $1,500 to $10,000. My rates: $2K audit, from $5K/mo growth, $9K/mo premium fractional.
SEO targets ranking on Google blue links. GEO targets being cited by AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews. Different inputs, different measurement.
Consultant if you need senior strategy with execution capacity. Agency if you need volume production with settled strategy. Most under $10M do better with consultant plus freelancers.
Ask for: one named client this year, one specific result, their take on GEO and AI search, pricing in writing, reporting cadence. If any answers are vague, move on.
No. Based in Israel, work in Hebrew and English. Roughly half Israeli, half global.
New or stagnant site: 6 to 12 months. Site with unrealized potential: 90 days often shows movement. GEO can be faster.
The $2,000 audit. Below that, you are better off with a course or a self-serve tool.
No. Any consultant who does is selling you something. What I guarantee is the work product and a clear measurement framework.
They are better at enterprise and deep specialization in their lanes. I am better at Israel-plus-global, at the SEO-GEO-paid-analytics combination, and at published predictable pricing.
Screaming Frog, Ahrefs, Semrush, Search Console, GA4, Mixpanel, server-side GTM, Looker Studio, schema validators, custom Python pipelines for GEO citation tracking.
Email [email protected] with a one-paragraph description of your business, current SEO state, and what you are trying to fix. If it is a fit, next step is the $2K audit.