Generative Engine Optimization

Buyers ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini before they ever reach Google. The model gives them an answer, names a few sources, and the rest of the market never gets seen. An llm citation consultant fixes the part most teams ignore: whether your brand is the source the model quotes. I work on getting you inside the answer itself, not on a blue link three scrolls down a page nobody opens.
My job is narrow and measurable. I find the prompts your buyers actually type, I check which brands the models cite back today, and I close the gap so the next answer names you. This is different from classic SEO. Ranking high on Google does not mean a model trusts you enough to quote you. As an llm citation consultant, I optimize for the citation, the snippet the model lifts, and the entity the model recognizes as authoritative.
Most pages were written for a person scanning. Language models read for extractable claims: a clear definition, a number with a source, a comparison stated plainly, a date. I restructure your highest-value pages so the model can lift a clean, attributable sentence. When the answer needs a source, yours is the cleanest one to grab. That is the whole game.
The work runs in three passes. First, measurement: I build a prompt set across your category and log who gets cited and who gets ignored, model by model. Second, structure: I rewrite the pages and add the schema, entity signals, and source-grade facts that make citation easy. Third, off-page: models pull from the wider web, so I get your claims into the third-party sources these systems already trust. Google’s own structured data documentation is part of that foundation, and I implement it correctly rather than half-installed.
I have spent fifteen years moving traffic to revenue, not vanity metrics. I took Elementor to 100x ARR and managed $100M+ in budgets, so I treat AI search the same way I treat every channel: as a pipeline question. An llm citation consultant who only counts mentions is selling you a screenshot. I tie each citation to the prompts that signal buying intent, then to the sessions and conversions those answers produce. If a citation does not move a buyer, I cut it and move on.
You should hire an llm citation consultant when you can see AI search sending people your way but cannot tell which prompts, which models, or which pages are doing the work. I make that visible. You get a ranked list of the prompts worth winning, the exact pages to fix, and a tracking setup that shows citation share changing over weeks, not a vague promise that it will help someday.
The engagement is built to hand off. I do the measurement and the first wave of fixes, then I leave your team a repeatable system: the prompt set, the page checklist, the schema templates, and the dashboard. Working with an llm citation consultant should make you independent, not dependent. The goal is simple and I hold myself to it: when a buyer asks a model about your category, your brand is the answer it cites, and that answer turns into revenue you can trace.
SEO chases Google rankings. I chase whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini cite you inside their answers. A page can rank first on Google and never get quoted by a model. I measure citation share per model, restructure pages so models can lift a clean attributable claim, and build entity and schema signals the models trust. The target is the citation, not the blue link.
I build a prompt set covering the questions your buyers type across your category, then run them through each model and log which brands get cited and which get ignored. I repeat this on a schedule so you see citation share move over weeks. Then I tie cited prompts to buying intent, sessions, and conversions, so you know which AI citations produce pipeline and which are noise.
Usually three reasons. Their pages state facts in extractable, source-grade sentences while yours read like brochures. Their entity is recognized across the trusted third-party sources models pull from, and yours is thin. And their schema is implemented correctly while yours is missing or half-installed. I diagnose which of these is hurting you, then fix the highest-impact gap first instead of guessing.
Page structure and schema fixes can change extractability within a refresh cycle, often a few weeks. Entity and off-page work, getting your claims into sources models already trust, takes longer because it depends on third parties. I show citation share moving on the dashboard rather than asking you to wait blind. If a tactic is not moving citations, I cut it and reallocate the effort fast.
I connect them to revenue. A mention you cannot trace is a screenshot, not a result. I rank prompts by buying intent, track which AI answers send qualified people your way, and follow those sessions to conversions. I have managed $100M+ in budgets and took Elementor to 100x ARR by treating every channel as a pipeline question, and I treat AI citation the exact same way.
Buyers increasingly start research inside an AI assistant, not a search box. They ask for a shortlist, and the model returns a handful of named brands with reasons. If you are not in that answer, you are invisible at the exact moment a buyer is forming their consideration set, and unlike a search result, there is no second page to climb onto. The shortlist is the whole game.
Getting cited is not the same as ranking on Google. Models synthesize answers from sources they trust, structured in ways they can parse, corroborated across the web. Generative engine optimization, or GEO, is the discipline of earning that trust and structure. It overlaps with SEO but is not the same craft. See GEO vs SEO.
Restructure your key pages so models can extract clean claims: direct answers, structured data, comparison tables, and FAQ blocks that map to how buyers actually ask.
Schema, consistent entity identity, and the off-page corroboration that makes a model confident enough to name you.
Models love to cite specifics. I help you publish data and benchmarks that become the source they quote, the way I do with my own AI search benchmark.
A pipeline that tracks when ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity start naming your brand, so the work is measured, not assumed.
I measure how often the major engines name you today across your priority buyer questions, and where competitors are getting cited instead.
Rework citable pages, add entity and schema signals, and publish the original research that earns a citation.
Track citation share over time, double down on what gets quoted, and feed the data back into the next round of content.
I do not sell a play I have not run. I publish an annual benchmark on the state of AI search visibility and I monitor my own citation share across the major engines. The methods on this page are the methods I use to make my own brand show up when someone asks an AI which fractional CMO or GEO consultant to hire. Read the benchmark at the state of AI search visibility and the broader practice at GEO.
| Dimension | Traditional SEO | LLM citation / GEO |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Rank a page on a results list | Get named inside a synthesized answer |
| Surface | Ten blue links | A shortlist of a few brands |
| Second chance | Page two exists | None; you are in the answer or invisible |
| Trust signal | Backlinks and on-page | Corroboration, structure, entity clarity |
| Measurement | Rank tracking | Citation-share monitoring across engines |
Citation work runs as a focused project or a retainer, and folds into a broader fractional or AI-marketing engagement.
2-4 week audit of your growth stack plus a 90-day roadmap. Fixed scope, converts to a retainer.
No honest consultant can guarantee a model output. What I can do is build the structure, authority, and original research that make a citation likely, then measure citation share so you see real movement rather than a promise.
SEO ranks a page on a list with a second page to fall back on. LLM citation work gets you named inside a synthesized answer where there is no second chance. The trust signals and measurement differ. See GEO vs SEO.
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI overviews, with monitoring across the major engines your buyers actually use.
Yes. I publish an annual benchmark on AI search visibility and monitor my own citation share. The methods I sell are the methods I run on myself first.
Citation-share monitoring: how often each engine names your brand across your priority buyer questions, tracked over time against a baseline.
It depends on your starting authority and content. Structure changes can shift extraction quickly; earning trust and corroboration is a multi-month compounding effort.
A fixed-scope diagnostic sprint runs $6,000 to $8,000. Infrastructure builds start at $5,000 per month. A full embedded operator engagement runs $8,000 to $18,000 per month.
Yes. Citation work is one piece of a broader GEO and AI marketing practice. See GEO and AI marketing.
Book a 15-min call. I will run a quick live check on how the major engines answer your buyer questions today.
Book a 15-min call. I will tell you whether this is your next move, or whether your money is better spent elsewhere.