Skip to content

Growth decision tools

Marketing Automation ROI Calculator

Build a business case for one recurring workflow. Include review, exceptions and ongoing cost, and keep recovered capacity separate from cash savings.

Scenario workbenchSample inputs

Automation business case

Separate recovered capacity, realizable cash benefit, full cost and payback.

Recovered time is capacity. It becomes cash savings only when costs actually change.

Set your assumptions

The recurring workflow

Presentation unit only; no exchange-rate conversion or market pricing data.

One recurring process, not a staff replacement claim.

Measured or estimated baseline. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 instances/month.

Manual effort per instance. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 minutes/instance.

Scenario valuation, not a salary benchmark. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 USD/hour.

Coverage and cash impact

Fraction eligible for automation. Allowed input: 0–100 %.

Fraction actually using the automation. Allowed input: 0–100 %.

Zero means capacity only; no cash-saving claim. Allowed input: 0–100 %.

Build and ongoing costs

One-time implementation cost. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 USD once.

One-time adoption/training cash cost. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 USD once.

Full recurring platform cost. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 USD/month.

Recurring inference cost. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 USD/month.

Recurring cash maintenance cost; do not also include it in supportHours. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 USD/month.

Human review, exceptions and ramp

Ramp starts here and reaches steady adoption. Allowed input: 0–100 %.

Linear first-to-steady adoption. Allowed input: 1–12 months.

Retained human approval effort. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 minutes/automated instance.

Share of automated instances needing extra rework. Allowed input: 0–100 %.

Additional effort, beyond review. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 minutes/exception.

Deducted from recovered capacity; distinct from maintenance cash cost. Allowed input: 0–1000000000000 hours/month.

Automation business case

Illustrative sample

Recovered capacity and realizable cash benefit are distinct, with every stated implementation/run cost included.

Monetary amounts use USD; no exchange-rate conversion. Display values are rounded to two decimals. CSV exports retain returned numeric values.

Annual recovered capacity498 hours
Gross capacity valuation
$24,900
Annual modeled cash benefit
$0
Full first-year costs
$9,700
First-year net cash impact
-$9,700
Cash payback
Not within12months
Modeled cash ROI
Not monetized

Adoption and cash schedule

MonthAdoption%Recovered hoursCash benefitRun costCumulative net cash
120100350-5,850
250280350-6,200
380460350-6,550
480460350-6,900
580460350-7,250
680460350-7,600
780460350-7,950
880460350-8,300
980460350-8,650
1080460350-9,000
1180460350-9,350
1280460350-9,700

What to do next

  1. Measure manual time and exception frequency.
  2. Run a bounded pilot with human approval and a cost ceiling.
  3. Compare actual effort, error rate and cash costs at30days.
Assumptions and limits

Assumptions used

  • Editable scenario inputs; not measured outcomes or benchmarks.
  • Build and training charged once; platform/model/maintenance charged every month. Negative recovered effort is included as added loaded labor cost.
  • Cash realization is an explicit user assumption, not staff-reduction evidence. No double-counting review/exception effort as both saved time and cash savings.

What this does not establish

  • No guarantee of business results.
  • Payback is only checked in this12month schedule; no extrapolated guarantee. Capacity value is not cash.

Calculations and pasted-evidence analysis run in this browser. Saving is optional.

Keep the work. Control the sharing.

JSON files include your inputs. CSV and copied briefs include results that may be sensitive. A copied tool link opens this tool without your inputs or result.

Hours returned are valuable, but they are not automatically cash saved

A lead-routing, reporting or lifecycle workflow can consume substantial recurring effort. An automation proposal needs more than the cost of the model call. Include adoption, human approvals, exceptions, maintenance and the actual use of the time that becomes available.

Method and assumptions

Estimate monthly instances and manual handling time. Apply realistic automation coverage and adoption, then subtract review and exception work. Multiply recovered hours by the loaded labor rate for capacity value. Calculate implementation and recurring operating costs separately. Only call a benefit cash savings when a corresponding cash expense actually changes.

An illustrative example

An illustrative workflow with 1,000 monthly instances and six manual minutes starts with 100 hours of effort. If only half the handling can be automated, the upper starting point is 50 hours before adoption, review and rework. Hosting, maintenance and implementation costs can make the first-year cash case negative even when capacity improves.

Turn the result into a useful next step

Choose one workflow, measure the current baseline and define an exception owner. Run a bounded pilot, inspect quality and realized time, and replace assumptions with observations. I personally design and deploy automation and AI-agent workflows, with optional ongoing monitoring and improvement.

What the result can establish

Estimated time value is not a headcount reduction or guaranteed economic return. The model does not certify an AI system’s accuracy, safety, reliability or autonomy. A negative benefit or no positive monthly net saving means there is no modeled cash payback.

Questions before you use the result

Are recovered hours the same as cash savings?

No. Recovered time is capacity. Cash savings require an actual reduction in expense or another explicitly measured monetizable benefit.

Which costs should I include?

Implementation, platform and model usage, maintenance, human review, exception handling and any additional recurring support cost.

What if payback is never reached?

A workflow can still improve capacity or quality, but it should not be sold as a positive cash-return project. Review its purpose and alternatives.

Can this decide whether an AI agent is safe?

No. The business case complements a separate assessment of permissions, data handling, failures, approvals and operational monitoring.

Do I need to leave my email to use the result?

No. The core tool works without an email gate. Contacting me about an engagement is an optional next step.

Who delivers the consulting work?

I do. I personally lead and deliver the agreed work. Your business retains its own responsibilities and access approvals; the scope is agreed with me directly.

Work with me on the next decision

I personally review the business problem, agree the scope with you and deliver the work. Bring the questions the tool helped you identify.